Search for: "Skidmore v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2020, 12:40 pm by sydniemery
Professor Camp is quoted in the following article: Sarah Skidmore Sell, Can survivors keep relief funds sent to dead taxpayers? [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:19 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
To which extent may state authorities (in this case, the State of North Carolina) act as copyright pirates? [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 The Appeal Court stated, however, that Jury Instruction No. 16 correctly listed non-protectable musical building blocks that no individual may own, and did not, as Skidmore claimed, exclude the particular use of musical elements in an original expression.Clarifying the tests for infringement and non-protectable elements of music could be a welcomed relief to the growing number of cases where similar songs are found to have been infringing. [read post]
The Final Rule largely tracks the NPRM, though with a number of interesting clarifications, including the following: Deleting the reference to Skidmore v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Thomas Merrill
This imports the sequencing familiar in the Chevron context from United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 10:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) heard another appeal in the Cleveland Clinic v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 2:39 pm by Brooke Wahlberg
On December, 10, 2018, the United States Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari in Kisor  v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 3:13 am by Broc Romanek
  Nonetheless, because SEC staff accounting bulletins “constitute a body of experience and informed judgment,” Skidmore v. [read post]