Search for: "Sklover & Donath, LLC v Eber-Schmid"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2010, 1:47 am
Case: Sklover & Donath, LLC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:41 am
Here, in Sklover & Donath, LLC v Eber-Schmid ; 2010 NY Slip Op 02002 Decided on March 16, 2010 ; Appellate Division, First Department the justices borrow from an unidentified law review article to state that hindsight is "an unreliable test for determining the past existence of legal malpractice" (Darby & Darby v VSI Intl., 95 NY2d 308, 315 [2000] [law review source omitted]). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:34 am
Thus, the court in the Federal Action had expressly held that the evidence and testimony to which plaintiffs assert defendants should have objected, was admissible” “Additionally, and as a general matter, disagreement with an attorney’s reasonablestrategic and tactical choices is not grounds for malpractice (Iocovello v Weingrad & Weingrad, LLP, 4 AD3d 208 [1st Dept 2004]), and “hindsight . . . is an unreliable test for determining the past existence of legal… [read post]
