Search for: "Slack v. Slack" Results 101 - 120 of 479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2012, 3:04 am
Similarly, if you are caught shoplifting from Macys or Bloomingdales, it makes no difference whether you stole a dress, skirt, or ten pairs of slacks. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 6:35 am
[On December 7,] the Delaware Supreme Court issued a three-page order in Akorn, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by Cary Coglianese
Even when no federal law exists to conflict with state or local regulation, subnational rules can be unlawful if their burden on interstate commerce is “clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits”—a test the Supreme Court announced in Pike v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Prosecutors say $32 million staged slip-fall ring drew on services of litigation finance firm [Matthew Goldstein and Jessica Silver-Greenberg, New York Times] Federalist Society podcast previews Frank v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:49 pm by Michael O'Hear
This COA violates 28 U.S.C. 2253(c), as well as this Court’s decision in Slack v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
I apologize for slacking off last week, but I was in central Europe taking in the dulcet tones of the language of love while testing the effects of an all-meat diet on the body of a sedentary middle-aged lawyer. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 But one juror taking a little cat nap (it’s warm in those  courtrooms, had a big lunch, counsel drones on, 11 others to pick up the slack, what’s the big deal?) [read post]