Search for: "Slotnick, Shapiro & Crocker, LLP v Stiglianese"
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 2:43 am
Since the terms of the fully integrated retainer agreement were unambiguous, there was no basis to consider parol evidence (see Slotnick, Shapiro & Crocker, LLP v Stiglianese, 92 AD3d 482 [2012]; Moore v Kopel, 237 AD2d 124, 125 [1997]). [read post]
