Search for: "Small v. Federal Government et al"
Results 161 - 180
of 425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
AIALA, Appellant, v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:28 pm
In Davitashvilli, et. al. v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:17 pm
Chamber of Commerce et al. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 2:57 am
The two cases are Pharo Gaia Fund Ltd et al. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
Link to opinion here.Ashraf Mahmoud, et al v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:53 pm
Jacobson, et al.), -- F.3d --, 2015 WL 110334 (8th Cir. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
National Review, et al. sought certiorari on two issues. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:30 am
Ross et al. to Andrew Jackson. 1835. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:04 am
On June 1st, 2017, the United States District Court (USDC) at Washington D.C. granted summary judgement in the case of Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 7:17 pm
Wright et al. at paras 51, 54. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:10 am
Victory Automotive Group, Inc, et al., No. 8:21-cv-1742 (M.D. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
In the cases found on Pacer, such as Sheppard et al v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:37 pm
Together with the Fourth Circuit Court’s 2007 decision in the case of Khaled el-Masri (which the Supreme Court refused to hear that year, in case 06-1613), the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Mohamed, et al., v. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 5:16 am
See also Part II-B of the amicus brief for the Christian Legal Society, et al. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
- Cassation Court’s criminal chamber orders destruction of 3,123 Abode of Chaos works of art – copyright questions (1709 Copyright Blog) Germany Federal Supreme Court: incidental introduction of new document and due process in opposition proceedings (EPLAW) Federal Supreme Court: Prior use right and contractual arrangements between inventor and alleged infringer (EPLAW) Hong Kong Giorgio Armani not amused by Giormani of Hong Kong (IP Dragon) India… [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
” Kohn and Sanjour battled the EPA for four years, and on May 30, 1995, in a case that impacted every government employee, the United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, in William Sanjour et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 1:42 pm
(EDTX 2017) (patent infringement) and a $2,600,000 verdict in DPX Gear v Prince et al. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:30 pm
Many of the amici in this case, for example, argue that the law has extensively benefitted everyone from children to senior citizens to local governments to small businesses. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 10:03 pm
The Ass’n for Molecular Pathology et al. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
The federal government would, in turn, reimburse the TPA for its payments in the form of an adjustment to the TPA’s assessed user fees for the ACA exchanges. [read post]
