Search for: "Small v. Hooks"
Results 1 - 20
of 320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In sharp contrast with Nixon v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm
This was preceded by the Court’s 2015 decision in Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:32 am
[1] National Small Business United et al v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:21 am
Carême v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:58 am
Carême v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:07 pm
What the Supreme Court did in Ohio v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 10:44 am
Consumers are merely bystanders in the dispute and they should not be on the hook to pay for programming they can’t access. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 2:57 pm
United v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 2:57 pm
United v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
In KPMG, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
This is the second in a hopefully finite series of blog posts about the legal issues in the NetChoice cases, in which platforms raise First Amendment challenges to social media laws in Texas and Florida. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:10 pm
The case is Gates v. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 8:13 pm
In any case, Price v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
On further appeal, the High Court held that ACL s 23 does apply to Mr Ho’s contract, with the result that the class action waiver clause was void: Karpik v Carnival plc [2023] HCA 39. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
The Justices have only themselves to blame for the presence of United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 1:41 pm
Bleam v. [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:59 am
A franchise’s spousal guaranty also keeps both spouses on the hook for obligations after divorce (unless one spouse indemnifies the other spouse for those obligations). [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
Sixth Circuit (unpublished): And the county would have been on the hook, had the trial court not screwed up the jury instructions. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
In any event, the authors had a very large sample size, which had the power to detect theoretically small differences as “statistically significant” (p < 0.05). [read post]
