Search for: "Smallwood v. Smallwood"
Results 61 - 80
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 4:22 am
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the DiPreta defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the cause of action alleging violation of Judiciary Law § 487 insofar as asserted against them by Charles (see Smallwood v Lupoli, 107 AD3d 782, 784; Crown Assoc., Inc. v Zot, LLC, 83 AD3d 765, 768; Oakes v Muka, 56 AD3d at 1058). [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:17 am
The plaintiff’s allegations of “intentional harm,” which the Supreme Court properly interpreted as stating a cause of action alleging prima facie tort, were unsupported by facts demonstrating that the defendants acted with “malicious intent or disinterested malevolence” in the prior action (Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 768, 772 [2017]; see Dorce v Gluck, 140 AD3d 1111, 1112 [2016]; Wiggins… [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 4:44 am
The plaintiff’s allegations of “intentional harm,” which the Supreme Court properly interpreted as stating a cause of action alleging prima facie tort, were unsupported by facts demonstrating that the defendants acted with “malicious intent or disinterested malevolence” in the prior action (Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 768, 772 [2017]; see Dorce v Gluck, 140 AD3d 1111, 1112 [2016]; Wiggins… [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:19 am
See, e.g., Smallwood, 61 So. 3d at 460. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:22 am
In the case of Smallwood v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
A closer look at Hospira v Cubist and daptomycin micellesIPKat returns to the Hospira v Cubist case to look in more detail at the claim relating to purifying daptomycin by altering by PH.* My My Mylan: The Trademark Silver Lining for Mylan's EPIPENMylan has recently come under fire for raising the price of the EPIPEN. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 8:45 am
” The case is Smallwood v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:32 pm
Nick Smallwood brings us this case.PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 103 [week ending on Sunday 3 July] Publicity Rights v First Amendment | EU Trade marks Article 28 Declarations | Non-EU UK in the UPC? [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am
Gordon v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:04 am
SMALLWOOD, 826 SO. 2D 221 (FLA. 2002), INCLUDE RECKLESS MISCONDUCT WHICH RESULTS IN THE UNNECESSARY INCURRENCE OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES? [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 10:53 am
In Smallwood v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am
The plaintiff’s allegations of “intentional harm,” which the Supreme Court properly interpreted as stating a cause of action alleging prima facie tort, were unsupported by facts demonstrating that the defendants acted with “malicious intent or disinterested malevolence” in the prior action (Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 768, 772; see Dorce v Gluck, 140 AD3d 1111, 1112; Wiggins & Kopko,… [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:18 pm
The Supreme Court upheld Arizona voting restrictions in Brnovich v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 2:30 am
Seven letters; begins with a B end with a D and is not Brevard county.)Blog contributor The Professor believes we are wrong, to wit:The Professor said...He is authorized to ban the usage under Rule 2.451 Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, which states:"(1) The use of electronic devices in a courtroom is subject at all times to the authority of the presiding judge or quasi-judicial officer to:(A) control the conduct of proceedings before the court;(B) ensure decorum and prevent… [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
* Tuesday TiddlywinksNick Smallwood brings you pirate [no, not that kind] Blackbeard's image rights and.. infringement by cake? [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:41 am
Smallwood v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 8:47 am
In Hickey v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:10 am
Smallwood, 826 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 2002). [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 8:30 pm
Smallwood, 68 F. 2d 57). [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 6:24 am
See Smallwood v. [read post]
