Search for: "Smiley v. State of California" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2015, 10:00 am by Anthony Zaller
  The bill was held in committee by the Assembly Committee on Appropriations this week, and will not likely make it out of the Committee this year. 3)     California Supreme Court addresses arbitration agreements and what makes such agreements “unconscionable” and therefore unenforceable In a consumer case, the California Supreme Court ruled in Sanchez v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:28 pm by Legal Talk Network
Girardi secured a 4.85 billion dollar settlement from Merck for Vioxx, a 785 million dollar verdict from Lockheed for personal injuries, and a 1.7 billion dollar settlement from the State of California for manipulating natural gas prices. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 8:02 pm by Florian Mueller
I hope this will be considered by the European Commission, which at least appears to be somewhat unconvinced of Samsung's SEP-related antitrust settlement proposal.On another Apple-Samsung note, Judge Koh's court in San Jose, California, stated on Wednesday that Apple's motion for a recovery of attorneys' fees and other costs, which Apple noted for a January 20, 2014 hearing, will be heard on May 1, 2014 instead. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:56 am by Florian Mueller
Apple could work around the non-essential ones, such as a smiley input patent. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 Still, the parable captures well the types of practical lessons Vietnam veteran John Smiley taught green Lieutenant Martins on the desert floor of Fort Irwin, California, and elsewhere. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]