Search for: "Smiley v. United States"
Results 61 - 66
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:56 am
Apple could work around the non-essential ones, such as a smiley input patent. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:46 pm
United States, 444 U.S. 37, 42 (1979). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:57 am
John v. [read post]
