Search for: "Smith & Nephew PLC"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2012, 11:52 am
Smith & Nephew Plc. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:39 pm
The U.S. subsidiary, Smith & Nephew Inc., agreed to pay a $16.8 million fine as part of a deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ, while the English parent company, Smith & Nephew plc, agreed to settle the SEC’s charges by paying more than $5.4 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:45 pm
In setting out the law as to the common general knowledge, the judge referred to his decision in KCI Licensing Inc v Smith & Nephew plc [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat) as approved by the Court of Appeal [2010] EWCA Civ 1260. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:01 am
Smith & Nephew, PLC, 2015 U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:21 am
Smith & Nephew PLC, March 1, 2018, U.S. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:23 am
. - Smith & Nephew PLC - FMC Corp. - Royal Dutch Shell - Eltek LTD - Hill-Rom Holdings SCOTUS: Awaiting the Halliburton v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:21 am
Smith & Nephew PLC, March 1, 2018, U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Full disclosure: David is a Reed Smith case, so this entry is also non-RS.Sergeants Benevolent Ass’n Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 52 [week ending on Sunday 14 June] - EU TM reform | Motivate Publishing FZ LLC and another v Hello Ltd | EPO’s Inventor of the Year: poll results | New network for new IP people | Delfi v Estonia | UPC fees | Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc | Canary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade… [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
Delaware: Smith v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 410 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 410 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 410 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 410 F. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
– Indian law on false patent marking (Spicy IP) Israel Israel Patent Office refuses reinstatement appeal for design (IP Factor) Japan Louis Vuitton locusts removed from art exhibition (Innovation Partners) (Copyright Litigation Blog) Kenya Kenya’s proposed constitution gives IP a mention (Afro-IP) Libya Modern look for Libya’s trade mark law (Afro-IP) Mexico Damages in Mexico: a helpful explanation (IP finance) Mexican Congress amends IP Law (Patent Docs) Poland… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(Class 46) Poland Reputation's rating (Class 46) Polish patent attorneys’ professionalism (Class 46) South Africa Orange miniskirt debacle less filling (Patent Baristas) (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours ‘per se’ (Class 46) Tunisia Tunisia lines up for copyright training (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: KCI negative pressure patent valid and infringed: KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith &… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
If so … (Class 46) Poland Reputation’s rating (Class 46) Polish patent attorneys’ professionalism (Class 46) South Africa Orange miniskirt debacle less filling (Patent Baristas) (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours ‘per se’ (Class 46) Tunisia Tunisia lines up for copyright training (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: KCI negative pressure patent valid and infringed: KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith & … [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
– Indian law on false patent marking (Spicy IP) Israel Israel Patent Office refuses reinstatement appeal for design (IP Factor) Japan Louis Vuitton locusts removed from art exhibition (Innovation Partners) (Copyright Litigation Blog) Kenya Kenya’s proposed constitution gives IP a mention (Afro-IP) Libya Modern look for Libya’s trade mark law (Afro-IP) Mexico Damages in Mexico: a helpful explanation… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am
In the present case (T 1517/17, consolidated with T 2719/19), the patent proprietor filed an appeal to the interlocutory decision of the opposition division revoking its patent. [read post]
