Search for: "Smith and Nephew, Inc." Results 121 - 140 of 357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm by Richard Torczon
Smith & Nephew, Inc., entered on Halloween 2019, a panel of the Federal Circuit held that the administrative patent judges (APJs) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) were improperly appointed, and remanded the case for a new decision by a properly appointed panel. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 12:28 pm
Other Metal on Metal Hip Manufacturer Lawsuits Other manufacturers of total hip replacement systems, including Smith & Nephew, Zimmer Holdings, Wright Medical and Biomet Inc. face similar complaints. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 12:28 pm
Other Metal on Metal Hip Manufacturer Lawsuits Other manufacturers of total hip replacement systems, including Smith & Nephew, Zimmer Holdings, Wright Medical and Biomet Inc. face similar complaints. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:05 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
DePuy ASR, DePuy Pinnacle, Biomet M2A Magnum, Smith and Nephew Birmingham and R3, Wright Profemur and Conserve, Zimmer Durom cup and Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II and Encore, are among hip replacements that continue to fail prematurely and require painful and risky revision surgery. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:29 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
DePuy ASR, DePuy Pinnacle, Biomet Magnum, Smith and Nephew, Wright Conserve, Zimmer Durom cup and Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II, are among hip replacements that continue to fail prematurely and require painful and risky revision surgery. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 3:05 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
DePuy ASR, DePuy Pinnacle, Biomet Magnum & M2a, Smith and Nephew, Wright Conserve, Zimmer Durom cup and Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II, are among hip replacements that continue to fail prematurely and require painful and risky revision surgery. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am by Andrea Shannon (US)
Smith & Nephew, which stated that certain statutory restrictions on the USPTO’s oversight of the administrative judges of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) violated the Appointments Clause of the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am by Andrea Shannon (US)
Smith & Nephew, which stated that certain statutory restrictions on the USPTO’s oversight of the administrative judges of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) violated the Appointments Clause of the U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
In "The wounded patent survived, was only just infringed, but no injunction", here, fellow Kat Darren wrote about the decision of Birss J in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc [2013] EWHC 3955 (Pat), a technically detailed case which amused Merpel, who commented that a case that started off being basically about chemistry ended up being basically about mathematics. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 10:59 am
Practice Tip: Since September 2012, Bonutti Skeletal Innovations LLC, an entity believed to be related to Bonutti Research, Inc., has initiated a series of patent-infringement lawsuits against medical-device manufacturers, including Depuy, Inc.; Zimmer, Inc.; Smith & Nephew, Inc.; Wright Medical Group, Inc.; ConforMIS, Inc.; Arthrex, Inc.; Linvatec Corporation; ConMed Corporation and Biomet, Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
Since September 2012, Bonutti Skeletal has initiated a series of patent-infringement lawsuits against medical-device manufacturers, including Depuy, Inc.; Zimmer, Inc.; Smith & Nephew, Inc.; Wright Medical Group, Inc.; ConforMIS, Inc.; Arthrex, Inc.; Linvatec Corporation and ConMed Corporation. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 8:03 am by Kalvis Golde
Smith & Nephew, Inc., Arthrex asks the justices to step in once again. [read post]