Search for: "Smith et al v. I-Flow Corporation et al" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am by Steve Bainbridge
Further assume that the corporation has substantial free cash flow—i.e., cash flows in excess of the positive net present value investments available to the corporation. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I devoted 90 odd pages to this topic in Unocal at 20: Director Primacy in Corporate Takeovers, so I don't expect to be able to make the complete case in a blog post. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
The de-indexing order was necessary to prevent the irreparable harm that flowed from the defendant’s carrying on business on the Internet. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
What’s the difference between Class I, II, and III recalls? [read post]