Search for: "Smith et al v. Scott et al" Results 1 - 20 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2011, 3:03 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Scott Smith has this story in the Stockton Record.The Ninth Circuit today rejected the attack on Arizona's lethal injection protocol in Dickens v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:32 pm by J
A landlord is not usually liable for acts of nuisance by his tenants unless he has, for example, encouraged to approved of the nuisance behaviour: see Smith v Scott [1973] Ch 314; Hussain v Lancaster CC [2000] 1 QB 1 and Mowam v LB Wandsworth [2001] 33 HLR 56. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:32 pm by J
A landlord is not usually liable for acts of nuisance by his tenants unless he has, for example, encouraged to approved of the nuisance behaviour: see Smith v Scott [1973] Ch 314; Hussain v Lancaster CC [2000] 1 QB 1 and Mowam v LB Wandsworth [2001] 33 HLR 56. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:53 pm
" Heritage Lake Property Owners Association, Inc., et al. v. [read post]