Search for: "Smith v. ABEL" Results 21 - 29 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
[L]abeling that includes theoretical hazards not well-grounded in scientific evidence can cause meaningful risk information to lose its significance. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 7:28 am
Thanks, Simon Haslam (Abel & Imray), spotting it.This was Halliburton's appeal against the decision of Pumfrey J (here , noted by the IPKat here), that its patent for rotary cone drill bits was invalid for insufficiency. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
  Legal Profession ,   Richard Abel   34. [read post]