Search for: "Smith v. Abercrombie" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Adell, Razing the Forest to Kill a Tree: EEOC V. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:40 pm
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION OPINIONSKENTUCKY CASES ONLY  OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0203n.06 2007/03/20 Abercrombie v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 1:15 am by Sophie Corke
Mylan, upholding Marcus Smith J.'s decision to deny an interim injunction against a generic company which launched at risk.Fellow GuestKat Rose Hughes reported on the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in Regeneron v Kymab, which found Regeneron's patents to be invalid for insufficiency, overturning the Court of Appeal decision and confirming the UK's strong sufficiency requirement.Trade MarksPermaKat Neil J. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 1:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
Solicitor General to provide the federal government’s views on the case of Smith v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 3:26 am by Louise Thorning Ahle
In the decision by DKBoA the DKBoA more or less repeated the arguments put forward by the DKPTO and referred to case C-487/07, L’Oréal v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  The Supreme Court absolutely got it right in Employment Div. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Stefanie Levine
  The ‘863 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Brass Smith, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
"  [5] The Abercrombie spectrum defines four possible categories of strength for trademarks. [read post]