Search for: "Smith v. Briggs" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2018, 4:46 am by CMS
Earlier this year, two editors of the UKSC Blog, Jack Ballantyne and Louise Pearce, were invited to interview Lord Briggs at the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:48 am
 Lord Briggs and Lord Sales) Unwired Planet International Ltd and another v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd and another [2020] UKSC 37 (26 August 2020) [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am by INFORRM
Abuse: The judge noted that following the decision of Mr Justice Briggs (as he then was) in Sectorguard Plc v Dienne Plc [2009] EWHC 2693 (Ch) the pursuit of any litigation must be proportionate. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by John Elwood
  The Court also granted cert. in Smith v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:39 am by Anthony McCain
Samsung, SCOTUS Sided With Reason Over Rounded Corners Michael Fleming, Glenn Vanzura, & William Briggs: Patent Owners Face Increased Fraud Liability Risk Get a Job doing Patent Law                   Perkins Coie Plumsea Law Group Neustel Law Offices Monsanto Ward and Smith [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am by John Elwood
Smith, 10-1115 (fourth); Reynolds v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:02 am by John Elwood
  Or the Court may be teeing up Martinez (along with Smith v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
The Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , then allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:07 am by Giles Peaker
In short, as Briggs LJ said, it requires the reviewing officer to apply a sharp focus, not just simply a formulaic answer. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
Yesterday the Court of Appeal (Lords Justices Kitchin, Briggs and Christopher Clarke), at [2015] EWCA Civ 607 , allowed ConvaTec's appeal and dismissed Smith & Nephew's cross-appeal. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm by John Elwood
  To that end, the Court now appears to be holding Smith v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 1:25 am
The twitching was erroneous in Rocknroll v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWHC 24 (Ch), a Chancery Division (England and Wales) decision of Mr Justice Briggs last week that had no shake-rattle-and-roll in it at all. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
A case such as Smith v Trafford Housing Trust is less clear cut. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm by Henry P Yang
This approach is consistent with the law, with support for example from a 1969 decision Smith Kline.Sir Robin finally remarked that there is no evidence that patents prevent innovation. [read post]