Search for: "Smith v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
On or about February 23, 2010, the DOJ Bureau of Firearms inspected Plaintiff Ten Percent Firearms in Taft, California. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:31 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, found for the first time that discrimination against transgender individuals constitutes sex discrimination in violation of Title VII. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
This appeal concerns a regulation promulgated by the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, purporting to interpret the federal prohibition on machineguns as extending to bump stocks. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
McGuire, Associate Director, Office of Law Enforcement, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms before the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Subcommittee on the Constitution, July 28, 1987. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am by jonathanturley
The specific statement read, in part: The Department of Justice is amending the regulations of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) to clarify that bump-stock-type devices — meaning “bump fire” stocks, slide-fire devices, and devices with certain similar characteristics — are “machineguns” as defined by the National Firearms Act of 1934 and the Gun Control Act of 1968 because such devices… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:19 am
He has tapped four former U.S. attorneys for the firm: Catherine Hanaway of Missouri's Eastern District; John Ratcliffe of the Eastern District of Texas; Michael Sullivan, former U.S Attorney for Massachusetts and former acting director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; and John Sutton of the Western District of Texas. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:40 pm
United States Bureau Of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms) sizzles along: Both sides filed motions for summary judgment Jan 31. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:54 pm by Roy Ginsburg
Moreover, even more recently, on April 20, 2012, the EEOC, in deciding a case involving the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, held in Macy v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-5652,Smith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, 19-296Issues: (1) Whether deference under Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by John Elwood
” In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives issued a regulation that defined “firearm” to include weapon parts kits that could readily be assembled into a firearm and indicated that “a partially complete … frame or receiver” constituted a frame or receiver. [read post]
22 May 2011, 10:13 pm by Jeff Gamso
Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms in which fire investigators were asked to identify the general area where two test fires were started in separate rooms. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Smith that the free exercise clause generally requires no religious exemptions from laws that are neutral and generally applicable. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am by David Kopel
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, 700 F.3d 185 (CA5 2012). 2127. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm by Employment Lawyers
  Complainant’s supervisor in Phoenix told her that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (Agency) had a position open at its Walnut Creek crime laboratory for which the Complainant was qualified. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, 19-296Issues: (1) Whether deference under Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
Just last year, the Justice Department reversed its century-old prohibition against recording interrogations and adopted a policy “establish[ing] a presumption that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), and the United States Marshals Service (USMS) will electronically record statements made by individuals in their custody. [read post]