Search for: "Smith v. Clerks Office et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Decided on June 3, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, AND WINSLOW, JJ. 516 CA 21-00840 [*1]IN THE MATTER OF DANA HENSLEY, ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILDREN AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL., PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, vWILLIAMSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS, ANDREW M. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Decided on June 3, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, AND WINSLOW, JJ. 516 CA 21-00840 [*1]IN THE MATTER OF DANA HENSLEY, ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILDREN AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL., PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, vWILLIAMSVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS, ANDREW M. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, et al., No. 20-333 Reasonable Royalty and Apportionment: Cochlear Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:07 am
Retail Clerks’ International Union et al). [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 1:57 pm
This is a welcome shift, since thousands of applications have been held captive in the Office in the wake of Supreme Court decisions culminating in Alice v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
Smith, et. al. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 4:57 am
Smith, et. al. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Apple) Inducement: Life Technologies Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
’s Office v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:37 am
Gall et. al., 2013-0941. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:41 pm
Weinstein et al, No. 4D12-2548, click here. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
” Clerk’s Papers (CP) (41037-1-II) at 24; RP (Apr. 29, 2010) at 11. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
http://j.st/cE4 View Case on: Justia Google Scholar Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, et al v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
., Lost Angeles, CA, LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT, GOLDFINGER, By: Scott G. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
MCGILL, Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Evidence -- Statements of defendant -- Private safety or rescue exception to Miranda rule where suspect is questioned by police officers when the suspect is confronted with a life-threatening medical emergency -- Where officers observed defendant chewing and attempting to swallow several pieces of crack cocaine, tried to stop defendant from swallowing too much of the substance, and asked defendant if he had any more crack… [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 3:36 pm
Former mayor Smith, et al. filed a motion to correct error, which the SJ denied, but then never perfected an appeal. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:12 pm
" In City of Terre Haute, Engineers Office of the City of Terre Haute, et. al., v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:07 am
The case, Parker, et al., v. [read post]
