Search for: "Smith v. Cochran" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
  Second, since White obliterated the legal theory underlying the class action/collateral estoppel case now pending (Smith v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:50 am by John Inazu
Martinez has drawn rebukes from a number of law bloggers (among others, Rick Garnett, Rob Vischer, and Greg Sisk on Mirror of Justice and Dave Opderbeck, Bob Cochran, and Steve Smith on Law, Religion, and Ethics). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809 and R(McLellan) v Bracknell Forest BC [2001] EWCA Civ 1510 stand in the way of the alternative construction argued for the occupiers (ie that they could bring their gateway (b) defence in the county court, rather than by commencing a fresh JR application). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809 and R(McLellan) v Bracknell Forest BC [2001] EWCA Civ 1510 stand in the way of the alternative construction argued for the occupiers (ie that they could bring their gateway (b) defence in the county court, rather than by commencing a fresh JR application). [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:10 am by R.J. MacReady
Here's a link to a more detailed summary.PD-1805-08, Joseph Denver Smith v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:09 am by R.J. MacReady
However, I do think it's kind of ironic that Judge Cochran starts off with quotes from the dissenting opinion from Abdul-Kabir v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 12:31 pm
People v Smith, 1185, 6273/06, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 7342; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:00 pm
On September 16, 2009, the CCA heard oral argument in the following cases: AP-75,793, Roosevelt Smith, Jr. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
This may come as a shock to Judge Keasler who concurred in Smith v. [read post]