Search for: "Smith v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2020, 8:16 am
For one, the justices could jettison the flawed framework established in Employment Division v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's decision then pointed out that "Hearsay is admissible in [administrative] disciplinary proceedings," citing Education Law §3020-a[3][c] and Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 109 AD3d 701, leave to appeal denied, 22 NY3d 856. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's decision then pointed out that "Hearsay is admissible in [administrative] disciplinary proceedings," citing Education Law §3020-a[3][c] and Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 109 AD3d 701, leave to appeal denied, 22 NY3d 856. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
In February 2017, the Suffolk County Department of Social Services (DSS) filed a petition against the mother alleging that she derivatively neglected the child. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm
To the contrary: CSS continues to receive many millions of dollars a year from the City to perform services as a “Community Umbrella Organization” (CUA), in which capacity it helps support foster children (such as in arranging for a child’s social services and doctor’s visits). [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Smith, Supra; Doe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Smith, Supra; Doe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Family Court Act 1089 (d) 2 (vii) was amended by adding a new clause (H) and Social Services Law §358-a, subd. 3 was amended by adding a new paragraph (g).Laws of 2019, Ch 716, enacted and effective December 20, 2019, amended Domestic Relations Law and the Civil Rights Law. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Similarly, the Social Services Law provides that, once approved, subsidy payments “shall be made until the child’s twenty first birthday” (SSL § 453 [1][a] ) and that payment of the subsidy may only be suspended if ACS “determines that the adoptive parents are no longer legally responsible for the support of the child or the child is no longer receiving any support from such parents” (SSL § 453[1][c]; see also 42 USC §… [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Similarly, the Social Services Law provides that, once approved, subsidy payments “shall be made until the child’s twenty first birthday” (SSL § 453 [1][a] ) and that payment of the subsidy may only be suspended if ACS “determines that the adoptive parents are no longer legally responsible for the support of the child or the child is no longer receiving any support from such parents” (SSL § 453[1][c]; see also 42 USC §… [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
Department of Justice), who appeared as amicus curiae in support of CSS and the other petitioners. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Low reimbursement rates for home care, waiting lists for family support and other community-based services and Medicaid prior authorizations practices challenge families as they try to access supports and services for their children. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:00 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
The district court denied CSS’s request, concluding that the city’s policy passed muster under the court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
(The government subsidies for this fourth option are calibrated to family income; my understanding is that the premium tax credit and cost-sharing reduction are not available for those families with income above 400% of the federal poverty level, or about $94,000 for a family of four. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 7:59 am
Montana Department of Revenue, Fulton v. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
Last Week in the Courts The judgement in Chowdhury Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department QB-2020-002120 was published this week. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:03 am
Tina Smith (D-Minn) and Rep. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 3:38 pm
The court then concluded that the closure order wasn't neutral and generally applicable (and thus didn't fall within Employment Division v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
In support of this argument, Mooppan and CSS lawyer Lori Windham repeatedly cited Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
