Search for: "Smith v. Department of Educ."
Results 1 - 20
of 425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2012, 7:09 pm
Anna Marie Smith (Cornell University - Department of Government) has posted Reading Thurgood Marshall as a Liberal Democratic Theorist: Race, School Finance, and the Courts (Education, Justice, and Democracy, ed. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:05 am
[Smith v Department of Education, 67 AD3d 555, motion for leave to appeal denied, Slip Opinion No: 2010 NY Slip Op 66952].The Department of Education then commenced a second disciplinary proceeding against Smith pursuant to Education Law 3020-a in which it alleged that Smith had made death threats against Tillem resulting in Tillem's recusing himself from the first proceeding thus “causing delay and thereby… [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 9:22 pm
Kansas Department of Labor (10th Cir., June 19, 2015) (court lacked jurisdiction to consider state department of labor's capacity to be sued, but affirms the department's nonentitlement to eleventh-amendment immunity)Martinez v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Court denies educator's motion to rescind a settlement agreement resolving a disciplinary action because the educator had a change of mindNobile v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Court denies educator's motion to rescind a settlement agreement resolving a disciplinary action because the educator had a change of mindNobile v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
It’s not that the Court had departed from its usual approach in Smith. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
Supreme Court adopted this past term in Carpenter v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:01 am
But in Smith v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am
Title VI is not a disparate impact statute, and executive agencies do not have the authority to transform it into one through rulemaking.This is the third blog installment discussing my article (written with Alison Somin)—The Department of Education's Obama-Era Initiative on Racial Disparities in School Discipline: Wrong for Students and Teachers, Wrong on the Law. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:10 am
" ** Similarly, the Aures decision demonstrates the problem that could result if a party fails to appear at an administrative hearing as scheduled -- the hearing officer may hold the hearing "in absentia" and the determination will be binding on the parties [Aures v Buffalo Board of Education 272 AD2d 664].The Smith decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2011/2011_01559.htm. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 7:54 pm
New York City Department of Education This Article 75 case was brought about by Petitioner, Theodore Smith, to challenge the decision and penalty, a one-year suspension without pay. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:14 am
Smith Judge Robert S. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 2:11 pm
Smith (Assimilative Crimes Act; Indian Country Crimes Act)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlJesse S. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Smith, the Second Department reminds to properly memorialize any agreed-upon understandings or changes to a divorce settlement agreement. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 9:30 am
First, the Louisiana Supreme Court on November 4, 2020 denied the Louisiana Department of Revenue’s writ application in Smith International, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 9:30 am
First, the Louisiana Supreme Court on November 4, 2020 denied the Louisiana Department of Revenue’s writ application in Smith International, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
CUOMO, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
CUOMO, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 2:54 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act, termination of parental rights) * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlCases featured: Smith v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 11:12 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that neither educator could avail herself of the hearing procedures set out in Education Law §3020-a.Further, while a counseling letter is “active” in a personnel file, the district may subsequently initiate disciplinary action based on the same event and the memorandum itself could be introduced as evidence in the course of the disciplinary proceeding.On this point, as the Court of Appeal ruled in Patterson v… [read post]
