Search for: "Smith v. Gaines" Results 41 - 60 of 799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2006, 3:12 pm
Justice Smith set out the tests for a stay as follows:It is common ground that the criteria to be satisfied by the AGBC in order to succeed on the application are those set out in American Cyanamid Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:04 pm
Once he discovered an outstanding warrant, the officer "gained an independent and intervening reason to arrest and search Myers. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
Termination for violating workplace rules defeats a claim for unemployment insurance benefits Smith v Commissioner of Labor, 296 A.D.2d 803 Violating the employer's policy or work rules concerning sexual harassment may not only result in the termination of the employee. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 11:00 am by Dave
In R(Alansi) v Newham LBC, Stuart-Smith J held that, although Ms Alansi had a legitimate expectation that she would remain a priority homeseeker on Newham’s housing register, Newham had not acted unreasonably and in abuse of its power by withdrawing its representation. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 11:00 am by Dave
In R(Alansi) v Newham LBC, Stuart-Smith J held that, although Ms Alansi had a legitimate expectation that she would remain a priority homeseeker on Newham’s housing register, Newham had not acted unreasonably and in abuse of its power by withdrawing its representation. [read post]
This post is the second of four, considering the decision of Smith J in Lidl v Tesco [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch), focusing on the passing off element of the judgment. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
Referred to as the biggest defamation trial in U.S. history, the case of BPI v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 4:33 am
 According to the recent Generics v Teva/Yeda decision, the burden of proof should therefore be on the alleged infringer, not the patentee. [read post]