Search for: "Smith v. General Motors Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Ford Motor Co., 170 N.W. 668, 684 (Mich. 1919). [10] Annot., Right of Business Corporation to Use Its Funds or Property for Humanitarian Purposes, 3 A. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 11:58 am by Steve Bainbridge
General Motors is a firm; it is pure fiction to say General Motors did anything. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:38 pm
  Second, original sources proved to be a better source for generating discussion and forcing analysis, than heavier reliance on secondary materials. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
I am generally available to talk with you during office hours on Mondays and Wednesdays, or, otherwise, by appointment. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:40 pm
General Motors Acceptance Corporation) NMAC (Cason v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:39 am by Don Cruse
Facts of this case are not meaningfully distinguishable from those in Gullo Motors v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 8:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s like saying that, because Ford Motor Co. has published corporate histories in its name, sponsors Masterpiece Theater, and creates extensive social media content, “Ford Motor Company” is now a title for Rogers purposes, or that the existence of The Texas Rangers: The Authorized History or The Code: An Authorized History of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codemakes those entities into titles for Rogers purposes. [read post]