Search for: "Smith v. German"
Results 1 - 20
of 267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2009, 3:12 pm
The validity of the German patent (EP 0620720 (DE 69224847)) is being challenged by Medela, Mölnlycke Health Care AB, and Smith & Nephew plc. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:24 am
McCall-Smith, Reservations and the Determinative Function of the Human Rights Treaty Bodies Christoph J. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 3:11 pm
The court began by noting that [In Keller v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:08 am
For non-Deutschsprechende [that's the German for "German-speaking", says Merpel] readers, the analysis compares the two cows more in terms of their individuality. [read post]
15 May 2007, 6:49 am
The Fifth Circuit on Monday affirmed a set of within-guideline sentences in US v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:47 am
In Cox v Ergo Verscherung AG [2012] EWCA Civ 854, the Court of Appeal considered whether, in a claim for damages recoverable from a German insurer, damages should be assessed under English or German law.The Court of Appeal considered two issues: first, the head of damages recoverable by the appellant; and secondly, the assessment or quantification of those damages. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:16 am
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/12-years-a-slave-draws-767183 and http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizonsunday/6294030/Sam-Smith-settles-up-royalty-dispute-with-Tom-Petty-and-Jeff-Lynne.html and for more on the UK's position on 'casual connection see Francis Day & Hunter v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:29 am
Yesterday’s published decision in Hale v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 4:02 am
Current state of the law The House of Lords decision in Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] ICR 250 is the leading case in this area. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 4:16 am
In McDonald v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Petersongs v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) pending from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v… [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am
Smith and Fritz Weinschenk, In Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and ReversalGrosz v MoMA Amicus Brief - Nazi Art Looting Purchase Copyright Litigation Handbook from West here tweetmeme_source = 'raydowd'; Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 1:27 pm
Board of Education and Bolling v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
As a result, the Nokia v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:01 pm
The part heard appeal in Vidal-Hall v Google (hearing to resume on 2 March 2015). [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 4:01 pm
The YouTube and Uploaded cases (C-682/18 Peterson v YouTube and C-683/18 Elsevier v Cyando) referred from the German Federal Supreme Court include questions around the communication to the public right, as do C-392/19 VG Bild-Kunst v Preussischer Kulturbesitz (Germany, BGH), C-442/19 Brein v News Service Europe (Netherlands, Supreme Court) and C-597/19 Mircom v… [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am
The decision comes on the heels of the Supreme Court’s decision in June in Arthrex v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am
The decision comes on the heels of the Supreme Court’s decision in June in Arthrex v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm
Smith. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Nikos tells all.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
