Search for: "Smith v. Haynes"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
According to the denial of rehearing order, In the en banc poll, eight judges voted in favor of rehearing (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Oldham), and nine judges voted against rehearing (Judges Stewart, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Wilson, Douglas, and Ramirez). [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 2:30 pm
Fund v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Haynes argument 2/22/2010 Wilkins v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am
” Thirteen judges agreed with the conclusion though twelve (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reversed on lenity grounds while eight members (Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson) reversed on the ground that federal law unambiguously fails to cover non-mechanical bump stocks. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am
Indeed, the Hewitt en banc majority had a heterodox makeup: Ho, Smith, Stewart, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Judge Ho wrote the majority opinion, which was joined by Judges Smith, Stewart, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Costa, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Reed Smith Sees Profits Rise as Revenue Dips The American Lawyer Reed Smith reached the $1 million profits per equity partner mark in 2009 with a 7 percent increase. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm
Twelve members (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reverse on lenity grounds. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 6:04 am
And industrial policy also involves IP policy.The opinion pece points to the record $2.175 billion verdict in VLSI v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH E. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am
Smith v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
A v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 2:33 pm
Haynes v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 5:12 am
Here's a note on a topic that has not been greatly appreciated in IP circles: the recent decision of the UK Supreme Court in R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another [2013] UKSC 1. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 8:51 pm
In re Will of Smith, 108 N.J. 257, 264, 528 A.2d 918 (1987). [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
On 8 November 2022 there was a hearing in the case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
3 May 2017, 7:04 am
Bass Pro filed a petition for rehearing and, in the en banc poll, seven judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jolly, Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, Elrod, and Haynes), and seven judges voted against (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Dennis, Prado, Southwick, Graves, Higginson, and Costa). [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm
Calcutt v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 11:54 am
See ADT L.L.C. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 10:01 pm
Torres v. [read post]
