Search for: "Smith v. Kelly" Results 161 - 180 of 277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Next Week in the Courts At 10.00am on Monday 31 January 2010, the Court of Appeal will give judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers, which heard on 14 January 2011 by the Master of the Rolls, Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Walter Ng, Kelly Ng, Bruce Horwitz, and The Mortgage Fund, LLCCase number: 13-cv-00895 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: February 28, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 1, 2014 08/21/2014 11/19/2014 2014-87 SEC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:37 am by Doug Cornelius
Supreme Court’s definition of an “investment contract” in SEC v. [read post]
Kelly Smith-Haley is an Attorney with Fox, Swibel, Levin & Carroll, LLP, and an editor of the Illinois Employment Law Letter. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode)   Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]