Search for: "Smith v. Marcus"
Results 1 - 20
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
Marcus Smith J set the terms of an annual global licence of $25.65 million plus $30 million for a 6-year past release - many orders of magnitude lower than Optis' sought. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 10:13 am
The Mississippi Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment (Smith v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
While the readers may remember that in InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) Mellor J adopted an exclusionary approach with comparables, disregarding most and eventually relied on a single prior licence LG 2017 to derive all the rates in that Judgment, Marcus Smith J differed from that approach and considered that at least in this case, the comparables only have value if an inclusive approach is taken. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal Ex-Treasurer for Rep. [read post]
9 Sep 2023, 4:22 am
That's why we should all be able to agree that DG GROW's proposal is--as Mr Justice Marcus Smith accurately noted--"a wholly bad idea. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:32 am
Regrettably, the proposal is a "wholly bad idea" as Mr Justice Marcus Smith noted, and fundamentally there are only three things that can be done: Go back to the drawing board and think up something different, such as a codification of Huawei v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:38 am
At a recent Concurrences event (to which I contributed as well), Mr Justice Marcus Smith--the President of the Competition Appeal Tribunal who also presides over High Court of Justice patent cases such as Optis v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:15 am
Of course, such decisions can and this one is indeed going to be appealed--which is also a safe assumption with respect to an even higher-profile recent FRAND ruling by the same court, Mr Justice Marcus Smith's Optis v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 9:26 am
To read the Opinion, here.AIPPI FRAND Rapid(ish) Response - 28 June at 6:00PMThis coming Wednesday, AIPPI UK is hosting a Rapid Response on the IDC v Lenovo and Optis v Apple FRAND decisions of Mr Justice Mellor and Mr Justice Marcus Smith, respectively. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:24 am
First, FTC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
Mr Justice Marcus Smith found that interest was payable as a matter of principle (it was discussed as a means to discourage hold-out). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm
That was fortunate because Mr Justice Marcus Smith, the President of the CAT, suspended the livestream for the first couple of hours. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:25 am
Apple FRAND determination by Mr Justice Marcus Smith (High Court of Justice, England and Wales) has been my most popular patent-related blog post in recent months. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:06 am
I had no idea that the judgment had already been entered when I wrote on May 27 that it could be further delayed by Mr Justice Marcus Smith's new merger case (Microsoft v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:18 pm
Mr Justice Marcus Smith can obviously see that the CMA is an outlier (I'll talk about the latest clearance decision further below) and wasn't impressed with the CMA's attempts to stall. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Apple FRAND ruling could be delayed by Justice Marcus Smith's new merger case (Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard) It's been almost a year since the Optis Wireless v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:30 am
Justice Marcus Smith--at minimum, of some of his decisions--whether you read FOSS Patents primarily for its coverage of patent litigation (the original focus), its commentary on select antitrust matters, or a combination of both. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am
Marcus Smith J disagreed and kept in mind the shortness of the period to trial. [read post]
