Search for: "Smith v. Masters" Results 61 - 80 of 371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
… and then Darren takes the floor for a more in-depth analysis.* Canary Wharf: great place name, not much hope for a trade mark ...Jeremy writes upCanary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2015] EWHC 1588 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision with a history, and a curious trade mark tale too.* A novel becomes a saga - Actavis v Lilly set to go on and onThe IPKat blogged last year about the… [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, the plaintiff failed to state causes of action sounding in breach of contract, legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud, as she failed to adequately allege the element of [*2]damages with respect to each of those causes of action (see Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d 989 [2021]; McSpedon v Levine, 158 AD3d 618, 621 [2018]; Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 848 [2012]; Smith v Chase… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
To decide the issue, the Court reconciled two Sixth Circuit cases, Smith v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
  I looked it up, and it's true: Maxus Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:40 pm by Anna Bower
As Trusty wonders aloud why the government doesn’t want a special master, Judge Cannon interjects with her first question: What exactly does the Trump team want the special master to do? [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 10:37 am
Luiz Alves, Individually and on behalf of Masters Entertainment Group, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:57 am by admin
Smith   Wheeling gulls spin and glide You’ve got no place to hide ‘Cause you don’t need one – Crosby Stills and Nash, Lee Shore   Some cases are born momentous (NFIB v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:18 am by INFORRM
  However, last week this all changed with the decision of the Court of Appeal in A v Independent News & Media Limited & Ors ([2010] EWCA 343). [read post]