Search for: "Smith v. McGinnis"
Results 21 - 29
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
L.J. 637-697 (2010).Smith, Nate. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:51 am
App. 3d 248, 913 N.E.2d 1147 (1st Dist. 2009); Smith v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:23 am
App. 3d 248, 913 N.E.2d 1147 (1st Dist. 2009); Smith v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 6:05 am
The judges in one case, Smith v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 12:18 am
McGinnis (Opinion here). [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 3:38 pm
As a side note, the 4th District (the tan one above) has ruled that such a claim cannot stand if the requirements of the act are not met in Smith v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
