Search for: "Smith v. Missouri Department of Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2012, 8:28 am
Smith and Bobby E. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 12:51 am
Smith, 2007 U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:12 am
Correctional Admin., 892 F.3d 53 (1st Cir. 2018) (“materially changes” employment conditions in a manner “more disruptive than a mere inconvenience or an alteration of job responsibilities”); Williams v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am
Missouri Department of Corrections, (8th Cir., June 10, 2013), the 8th Circuit held that prison official's compelling interest in security justified their denial of group worship services for members of the Christian Separatist Church Society.In Small v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
Missouri Department of Corrections v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
Briefly: Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal reports that the Department of Justice is “prepared to correct its possibly misleading statements” made to the Court during proceedings in Nken v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:42 am
Neither the AG nor counsel for the Department of Corrections raised any issue regarding the memoranda. 6. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
Sauer was a law clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia and served as solicitor general of Missouri. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
(Full disclosure: I was a member of the litigation team challenging Missouri's protocol in one of those cases, Taylor v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
" U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 23, 2008 Smith v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
§ 1498(a) for the eminent domain taking of a patent license by the government is a suit for patent “infringement” under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:34 am
Which is entirely unconstitutional, says Erica Smith of the Institute for Justice, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Reed v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:46 am
On June 12, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Hill v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
The trial court entered judgment in favor of the City and the Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed in City of Sullivan v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Smith 13-946Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit failed to apply the deferential standard of review required by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
" Missouri: R.L. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
The court also denied review in a case in which the Missouri Department of Corrections claimed it had been deprived of a fair trial in an employment discrimination case because the judge struck potential jurors who had religious objections to homosexuality. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Petitioner Shawn Wass seeks clarification of Missouri v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
” Stuart Harrow, a Defense Department employee, was furloughed because of budget shortfalls. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
" Missouri: R.L. v. [read post]
