Search for: "Smith v. Moore" Results 61 - 80 of 404
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Dennis Crouch
In response, Smith & Nephew rely heavily on United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It is a duty of care detached from its moorings (risk of objectively ascertainable physical injury) and then extended into a duty to prevent other people harming each other. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
") After conducting the most thorough judicial review to date of relevant social science on the net public-safety effects of allowing public carriage of guns, Judge Richard Posner in Moore v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am by John Elwood
Smith and Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
  The Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC) has recently announced hearings designed to push forward legislative agendas in the US Congress to produce measures targeting Chinese central authority policies in Hong Kong and Xinjiang. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
Moore, requiring the government to prove unlawful distribution of a controlled substance “outside the usual course of professional practice” and “for other than a legitimate medical purpose [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 11:27 am by Dennis Crouch
Smith; and former vice-chief Jay Moore. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Judge Pauline Newman dissented in part from a decision authored by CAFC Judge Moore yesterday, explaining that, while she agrees that New Vision Gaming’s request for vacatur and remand of two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions in light of Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Judge Pauline Newman dissented in part from a decision authored by CAFC Judge Moore yesterday, explaining that, while she agrees that New Vision Gaming’s request for vacatur and remand of two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions in light of Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]