Search for: "Smith v. Ohio" Results 181 - 200 of 995
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
Having spent my time and energy on the first seven cases, I’m going to be fairly summary for the last six; Smith v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
§ 1498(a) for the eminent domain taking of a patent license by the government is a suit for patent “infringement” under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
Texas, a Supreme Court decision from 2017, to find that an Ohio court unreasonably applied Atkins v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
Metzenbaum's gun ban gains momentum In the late 1980s, the Senate's leading gun control advocate was Howard Metzenbaum (D-Ohio). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
We're asking the Ohio Supreme Court to review the decision upholding it.A few weeks ago, Patrick Kabat (Chandra Law), Carolyn Allen, and I filed an appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court, asking it to agree to review a very interesting -- and, in my view, troubling -- Ohio Court of Appeals decision. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Smith, in 1920, the Court prohibited the use of direct democracy (in that case the referendum device, a close cousin of the initiative) that the people of Ohio tried to employ to undo the state’s (already finalized) ratification of a federal constitutional amendment under the terms of Article V of the Constitution, which also uses the word “Legislature. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Wayfair: Court approves state sales tax collection from out-of-state vendors [Caron/TaxProf first and second link roundup, Trevor Burrus and Matthew Larosiere, earlier] Ohio v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court upheld Ohio’s process for removing inactive voters from its rolls [in Husted v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:47 am by Richard Hunt
” The relevant regulations focus on communications services, and in Est. of Smith v. [read post]