Search for: "Smith v. Patterson"
Results 41 - 60
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2010, 3:34 am
Real Estate Corp., 60 AD3d 841, 843-844; Tenore v Tenore, 45 AD3d 571, 571-572; Smith v Moore, 31 AD3d 628, 629; Matter of Lutz v Goldstone, 31 AD3d 449, 450-451; Thorson v New York City Tr. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 2:58 am
Real Estate Corp., 60 AD3d 841, 843-844; Tenore v Tenore, 45 AD3d 571, 571-572; Smith v Moore, 31 AD3d 628, 629; Matter of Lutz v Goldstone, 31 AD3d 449, 450-451; Thorson v New York City Tr. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am
United States, 19-5652,Smith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am
(relisted after the November 22, 2019, December 6, 2019, December 13, 2019, January 10 and January 17 conferences) Patterson v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 5:01 am
Smith a copy of a brief in a related case, which cited Buchanan. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
Patterson, Reestablishing the Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 38 Arti K. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
A claim of double jeopardy is sometimes encountered in efforts to suppress a disciplinary action in situations were the charges reflect the same acts or omissions that were the subject of counseling memoranda or performance evaluations.The courts have rejected this theory.** In Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98, the Court of Appeals said that including charges concerning performance that were addressed in a counseling memorandum was not “double jeopardy. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 9:35 am
Michael V. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
Related Blog Posts: Texas Poultry Company Enters into $27.5 Million Settlement After Crash Allegedly Caused by Employee Falling Asleep at Wheel Texas Court Remands Fraud Case Arising from 18-Wheeler Wrongful Death Lawsuit – Patterson v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Indeed, the ruling seems to presuppose that the pension plan was even property of the estate, which seems unlikely under the Supreme Court's 1992 Patterson v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Indeed, the ruling seems to presuppose that the pension plan was even property of the estate, which seems unlikely under the Supreme Court's 1992 Patterson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
” No, according to the Court of Appeal's ruling in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 6:34 am
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:19 am
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:14 am
(Al) Smith Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
” Rubenstein also pointed out that in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98, the Court of Appeals ruled that including charges concerning an employee's performance that were previously addressed in a counseling memorandum does not constitute double jeopardy. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Turner v. [read post]
Jan. 5 - 9, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:13 pm
Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 09a0002p.06 David Patterson v. [read post]
Jan. 5 - 9, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:13 pm
Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 09a0002p.06 David Patterson v. [read post]
