Search for: "Smith v. Providence Health & Services" Results 101 - 120 of 733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
Jude not as a “health care provider,” but as a “health care medical products manufacturing, sales, service, and consulting institution. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Osmose Utilities Services, 2012 WL 94497, at *4 (W.D. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Vohra Health Services, P.A., 2022 WL 320952, No. 19-62078-CIV-SMITH (S.D. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 5:01 am by Lindsay F. Wiley, Steve Vladeck
And although there has been significant clamor among conservatives to overrule Smith (including three justices expressly endorsing such a move in June’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 8:26 am by MBettman
R.C. 2151.421(K) (Requiring child services to provide a memorandum of understanding to law enforcement.) [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:43 am
Smith because her brain injury and subsequent death was caused by the negligence of health care providers she went to see as a result of the defendants negligence. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
H.R.2535 - To elevate the position of Director of the Indian Health Service within the Department of Health and Human Services to Assistant Secretary for Indian Health, and for other purposes. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
A user of a service, as Kulmatycki was when he accessed [Lazette’s] e-mails, is not also the provider of those same e-mails. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:35 am by James Segroves
Unlike in traditional Medicare, which uses provider and supplier participation agreements, the Medicare Act expressly provides for the Secretary of Health and Human Services to enter into “contracts” with MA organizations. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am by Susan Landau
The Government's collection of telephony metadata from a third party such as a telecommunications service provider is not considered a search under the Fourth Amendment, at least under the Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. [read post]