Search for: "Smith v. Public Service Commission"
Results 41 - 60
of 585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" 4 NYCRR, in general, applies to employees of the State in the Classified Service[2]and the employees of public authorities, public benefit corporations and other entities for which the New York State Department Civil Service administers the Civil Service Law. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission and its companion (but not-yet-granted) case Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Smith v Kunkel16 is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Smith v Kunkel16 is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
ATKINSON, Plaintiff, : v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
ATKINSON, Plaintiff, : v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:46 am
Misconduct in office can be shown by (1) commission of a wrongful act, (2) commission of a `lawful act in a wrongful manner,’ or (3) `fail[ure] to do an act required by the duties of the office. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 8:54 pm
(NFP) In Northern Indiana Public Service Company v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 10:39 am
" Joshua Smith v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:57 am
” Smith points to the Supreme Court’s 1995 decision in Hurley v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
This episode is a follow-up podcast to Episode 9, Epic v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:30 am
[What the Supreme Court should do in 303 Creative v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:10 pm
Abood v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 7:55 am
Even if Smith believes God is calling her to do so through her for-profit company, the company need not hold out its goods or services to the public at large. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Here's what had to happen before her case would have been properly presented to a court for resolution: Smith would have had to actually open up a wedding website to the public; Having done so, Smith would have had to receive a request from a same-sex couple for wedding-related web design/hosting services; Having received such a request, she would have had to refuse to provide the services requested, services that she would happily… [read post]
