Search for: "Smith v. Rae-Venter Law Group" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Are punitive damages available in class actions asserting statutory wage & hour violations? Savaglio v. Wal-Mart may have the answer.
19 May 2008, 11:13 pm
Rae-Venter Law Group (2002) 29 Cal.4th 345, 350 [127 Cal.Rptr.2d 516] (herinafter "Rae-Venter Law Group"), Mazur upheld the employee's right to sue for unpaid wages under both a breach of contract and statutory theory. [read post]
the complex litigator - http://www.thecomplexlitigator.com/post-data/
California Supreme Court Holds 3 Year Statute Governs All Section 203 Penalty Actions, But Finds Penalties Non-Restitutionary Under the UCL: Pineda v. Bank of America
19 Nov 2010, 7:35 am by Matt C. Bailey
Rae-Venter Law Group (2002) 29 Cal.4th 345, 360.) [read post]
Bailey Class Action Daily - http://www.baileydaily.com/