Search for: "Smith v. Richardson" Results 101 - 120 of 153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
Tendering of a cheque can amount to (conditional) payment, if the cheque is honoured (Felix Hadley & Co v Hadley (1898) 2 Ch 681 ), and if so, counts as payment at the date the cheque is tendered (Homes v Smith (2000) Lloyds LR 139 ). [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am by law shucks
And when it’s former-associate v. firm, that’s all the more interesting. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
The Application was refused, with Lord Summers relying on R v Legal Aid Board ex p. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Bailii has recently made available a judgment of 22 June 2016 in the case of Richardson v Google UK Ltd [2016] EWHC 1534 (QB)) in which Sir David Eady made an extended civil restraint order against the claimant. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:49 am by Randy Barnett
Richardson, a semantic originalist would say that the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment was constant all along. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:56 am by Jim Hassett
While we are not aware of any AmLaw 100 firms that have gone so far as to appoint the Value Council mentioned in Step 2, we did write an article for Bloomberg Law Reports recently entitled “The Rise of the Pricing Director,” including interviews with senior lawyers and staff at Baker & McKenzie, Fish & Richardson, Mayer Brown, Vinson & Elkins, Reed Smith and Winston & Strawn which described what law firms are doing to address a number of the issues… [read post]