Search for: "Smith v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2007, 3:42 am
The basis of the motion was the "Department's" assertion of the attorney-client privilege with respect to both individuals, as they both formerly served as attorneys to the Secretary of the Department of Corrections. 4. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Jon May
Had he, there would be no need for the constitutional crisis that would arise from the interpretation of the law advocated by Tribe, et al. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
Canada The Superior Court of Justice, Ontario handed down judgement in Marcellin v LPS et all 2022 ONSC 5886. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 26 conference)   CTIA-The Wireless Association, et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]