Search for: "Smith v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2013, 5:48 pm by James Ridgway
  In big money benefits cases such as Smith v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 3:00 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Smith (Exclusion; Banishment; Indian Civil Rights Act)U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
City of Seattle (Judicial futility doctrine and removal from state court to federal court) Two petitions for certiorari were denied on 3/20/23:Smith v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
§ 502 when the Veterans Judicial Reform Act provides the sole avenue for review of the Secretary’s decisions; and (2) whether the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has authority to review an interpretive rule reflecting the Department of Veterans Affairs’ definitive interpretation of its own regulation, even if the VA chooses to issue that rule through its adjudication manual Manhattan Community Access v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
Having spent my time and energy on the first seven cases, I’m going to be fairly summary for the last six; Smith v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 1:52 am by INFORRM
The veteran Guardian journalist Michael White has written a thoughtful piece on the celebrity threesome super injunction case. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
So far, four supporters of his election falsehoods have won Republican primaries for secretary of state. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am by Anushka Limaye
Thursday, Dec. 6 at 9:30 a.m.: CSIS will host a conversation with Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]