Search for: "Smith v. Settle"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[6] The net result is that the settling defendant, for the action to stay settled, must agree both to rescind her past in-court statements contesting the truth of the Commission’s allegations and promise never again to contest the truth of the Commission’s allegations herself, or even permit others to contest the allegations. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
” South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am
The case ultimately settled for $787.5 million, the claim itself being valued at $1.6 billion. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
While the readers may remember that in InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) Mellor J adopted an exclusionary approach with comparables, disregarding most and eventually relied on a single prior licence LG 2017 to derive all the rates in that Judgment, Marcus Smith J differed from that approach and considered that at least in this case, the comparables only have value if an inclusive approach is taken. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
The Court wisely kept its settled First Amendment doctrine in Smith, which was the bulwark against the religious drive to “liberty” with no limit. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 10:21 am
And on Jan. 10, in Smith v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Villagran v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of London-Walker v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 4:52 am
However, this Court previously affirmed the 10% award of the Agrifos assets, applying the well-settled rule that marital assets do not have to be divided equally (Cotton v Roedelbronn, 170 AD3d, 595, 595-596 [1st Dept 2019], citing Arvantides v Arvantides, 64 NY2d 1033, 1034 [1985]). [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
In Rost v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
” In NAACP v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
Speaker Williams, who goes by his first name Rob, is often confused with Jim Miller, who has insisted that he is not in fact Speaker Steve Smith. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
” The Court next applied the same logic in Smith v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Yet that view is contrary to roughly a century of settled case law. [read post]
