Search for: "Smith v. Social Security Admin." Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2020, 6:01 pm by MOTP
She provided Smith's date of birth to the receptionist who answered her call, and gave his social security number to David Wright, Esquire ("Wright"), the Moss attorney with whom she spoke. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 6:28 am by Rosalind English
What it has done – and this is another string to Mr Bedford’s bow – is demonstrate, for example in relation to social security rights, that the autonomous meaning of civil rights has no very clear boundary. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2019) EWHC 452 (Admin) (For transparency, I acted for one of the interveners, the Residential Landlords Association, in this case.) [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
The most striking legal story of the week was the reporting of the Administrative Court’s ruling on Article 50 and the Royal Prerogative ([2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin)). [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Bloomberg reports that 400 million social media users are set to lose their anonymity in India under new rules to be published shortly. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The libel trial in the case of Doyle v Smith will begin on the same day before Warby J. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Morgan Stanley said that Marsh did not take any sensitive passwords or Social Security numbers, and that it had not found any evidence that the breach resulted in any losses to customers. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the case of Kirkegaard v Smith. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am by bradhendrickslawfirm
He said that his income consisted of Social Security retirement benefits, plus dividends from approximately $450,000 in investments. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog  In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3) as… [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am by Graeme Hall
Smith & Ors v Ministry of Defence [2011] EWHC 1676 (QB) (30 June 2011): Human rights claims of 6 soldiers killed or injured in Iraq allegedly due to faulty equipment/ poor training struck out following decision in R(Smith) in Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
” Officials have relied recently on delegations to claim the power to lead the Social Security Administration, Bureau of Land Management, and the Fish and Wildlife Service, not to mention to serve as the Deputy Director of Homeland Security. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
  The Privacy and Information Security Law blog also has a post. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
Tackling Twitter and Facebook fakes: identity theft in social media. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The High Court has ruled that security and intelligence services must obtain “prior independent authorisation” to access individuals’ communication data from telecommunications companies (Liberty v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 1630 (Admin)). [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Twitter has threatened to sue Meta following the launch of rival messaging app, Threads. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The Mass privatei Blog has posted an impactful infographic from Security Baron which highlights what data social media companies know about users. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:56 am by Rob Robinson
Judiciary Faces New EDD Rules - http://tinyurl.com/3borj3s (Gina Passarella) Are E-discovery Review Platforms a Serious Security Risk? [read post]