Search for: "Smith v. Social Security Administration"
Results 61 - 80
of 280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
The Commission consists of nine Senators, nine Members of the House of Representatives, and five senior Administration officials appointed by the President. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Cover, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Professor of Law & Director, Institute for Global Security Law and Policy, Case Western Reserve University School of Law 1:40 - 3:00 -- Law and Literature Tawia B. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
Former SAS soldier Ben Roberts-Smith’s defamation trial has been delayed until 1 November, but further delays are expected as his barristers request that the trial is moved to another city for security reasons. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Anyone involved in the disciplinary process or making a seniority determination in a layoff situation must consider these elements, as an employee’s rights to administrative due process and layoff rights, if any, depend on his or her actual, i.e., statutory, appointment status and the actual jurisdictional classification of the position to which he or she has been appointed. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Anyone involved in the disciplinary process or making a seniority determination in a layoff situation must consider these elements, as an employee’s rights to administrative due process and layoff rights, if any, depend on his or her actual, i.e., statutory, appointment status and the actual jurisdictional classification of the position to which he or she has been appointed. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:46 am
He is, for example, a recognized leader in the response to Alice Corp v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:06 pm
Rather, the petitioner "cannot provide his Social Security number as a condition of obtaining work without violating his religious beliefs. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
A National Security Council spokeswoman did not reply to a request for comment. . . . [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm
That case is looking at whether administrative law judges deciding cases under the Social Security Act should have been appointed by the President Whether a claimant seeking disability benefits under the SSA forfeits an appointments-clause challenge to the appointment of an administrative law judge by failing to present that challenge during administrative proceedings. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 4:53 am
” So, for example, inadvertent disclosure of the fact that “John Smith’s favorite color is blue” or “the Smith household likes to watch old episodes of Breaking Bad” would allow the Smiths to sue the company that suffered the breach. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 5:57 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
"The term 'prior restraint' is used to describe administrative and judicial orders forbidding certain communications when issued in advance of the time that such communications are to occur. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:30 am
Arthrex, Smith & Nephew v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am
Alex Engler suggested how the Biden administration can combat misinformation on social media platforms. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
Judge Richard Smith said “the gravity of the posts and the plaintiff’s social standing in his Church and community require a substantial award of damages in order to convince bystanders of the baselessness of the allegations against the plaintiff”. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:15 pm
The petition in Davis asks the Supreme Court to determine whether claimants seeking disability benefits or supplemental security income under the Social Security Act (SSA) must exhaust their Appointments Clause challenges with the administrative law judge (ALJ) at the agency in order to obtain judicial review of that challenge in federal court. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:11 am
Smith, Brian V. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:38 pm
Miller (Wikipedia) U.S. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
"The term 'prior restraint' is used to describe administrative and judicial orders forbidding certain communications when issued in advance of the time that such communications are to occur. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
This is especially notable in Republican administrations, as with the obscenity of the Trump “tax cut,” but also, if truth be known, in the more-or-less “neo-liberal” administrations of both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, where the well-off became even better off even if there were also some efforts, as with the Earned Income Tax Credit or Obamacare, to pay at least some attention to the plight of those seen by Mitt Romney in 2012 as “the… [read post]
