Search for: "Smith v. Spisak" Results 41 - 60 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
The question presented is what standard the federal court should apply in considering such a claim, and in particular whether the federal court can consider evidence that was not presented to the state courts. ------- Title: Smith v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
" At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger surmises that Justice Sotomayor, as evidenced by her questions in Tuesday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 3:40 am
  After oral arguments the  other day in Smith v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
Kentucky and Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:46 pm
Kentucky (08-651), here for Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:42 am
Supreme Court, my colleague Michael Benza will argue on behalf of the respondent in Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:20 am
In the first capital case to be argued this term, Smith v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:30 am
Spisak (08-724) — unanimity of jury as an issue in finding mitigating evidence in a capital case South Carolina v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Now it appears certain that the high court has decided to hold the Philadelphia prosecutors' petition in abeyance pending the outcome of Smith v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
Brief description of the case is from ScotusWiki: Tuesday, Oct. 13 Padilla v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on October 13 in the case of Smith v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:02 am
[This is the fifth in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]