Search for: "Smith v. State of N. C" Results 81 - 100 of 759
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2023, 9:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Smith, 333 F.3d 1018, 1026 (9th Cir. 2003), superseded in part by statute on other grounds as stated in Breazeale v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
And sure enough, whereas the July 2021 version of the TMEP (Section 1209.01(c)(i)) stated that “[t]he examining attorney has the burden of proving that a term is generic by clear evidence,” the same section in the July 2022 version (here) does not. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm by admin
The distinction between relied upon, and admissible, studies is codified in the Federal Rules of Evidence, and in virtually every state’s evidence law. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing Smith's constitutional challenge to 4 NYCRR 5.3(c), the Appellate Division rejected Smith's argument noting his contenti [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing Smith's constitutional challenge to 4 NYCRR 5.3(c), the Appellate Division rejected Smith's argument noting his contenti [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Marc DeGirolami
Smith, “Liberalism and Hate Speech,” Law and Religion Forum (2022)   Week 10, Thursday, April 13: Compelled Speech and Association West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Smith, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 915, at pp. 937-38), or “a sufficient substitute basis for testing the evidence” (Khelawon, at para. 105). [read post]