Search for: "Smith v. Strickland"
Results 1 - 20
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2022, 5:34 am
Steven Hager PDF Reprint: The Rule of Law: McGirt v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:17 am
Check the Smith v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:02 am
The always feisty Judge Meyers dissented to again express his belief that the second prong of Strickland should not apply to ineffective assistance claims at punishment. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Title: Strickland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:06 am
The Court of Appeals reverses, the conviction stands, and Smith remains in jail.The case is Fischer v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:31 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 5:20 am
Recently I taught Strickland v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:12 pm
Washington v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
See Strickland v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:55 am
Strickland reached the end of its road. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:55 am
Strickland reached the end of its road. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 5:30 am
Strickland v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:29 am
Smith, 539 U.S. 510 (2003) (incorporating the American Bar Association Guidelines For the Appointment and Performance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases as the professional standard of performance), and Rompilla v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:17 pm
Lattimore, No. 12-55667 (per curiam en banc opinion; panel was Thomas, Reinhardt, McKeown, Tallman, Rawlinson, Bybee, Callahan, Bea, NR Smith, Murguia, and Watford) --- An en banc panel affirmed that the usual test for ineffective assistance of counsel found in Strickland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
(Strickland was a capital case.)This panel questioned the validity of prior Ninth Circuit decisions like Cooper-Smith v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Which consists entirely of Judges Bybee and Milan Smith. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:59 am
Check the Wood v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:57 am
Strickland v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:51 pm
Pinholster v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:03 am
The reality is that her client attempted an illegal competitive advantage and got caught.The case is Amtrust North America v. [read post]
