Search for: "Smith v. Sullivan"
Results 1 - 20
of 259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
On the one hand, the argument for the fragility of Sullivan after Bruen is examined in Alexander Hiland & Michael L Smith “Using Bruen to Overturn New York Times v Sullivan” 50 Pepperdine Law Review (forthcoming) (SSRN). [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:00 am
Sullivan Co. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:30 am
Smith follow. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:19 pm
Polk, Linda Tiano, Linda V. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:38 am
” As Sullivan notes, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)—the basis of the Burwell v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 12:02 pm
Smith v. [read post]
16 May 2020, 3:55 am
Fokker Services and US v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:04 am
Smith (now with Jenner and Block, former law clerk to Justice Powell). [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:24 am
In the case of McGuinness v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 9:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 5:32 am
In this decision, the federal court took issue with the Superior Court’s decision in the case of Sullivan v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:43 am
Florida, Docket No. 08-7412 and Sullivan v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Supreme Court's class-action-related decisions this Term, including Wal-Mart, Concepcion, and Smith v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:03 am
The developers lose the case, not because the Village did not demonstrate anti-Jewish animus, but on more mundane procedural grounds.The case is BMG Monroe LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Kersey v. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP has represented the defendants throughout this 13-year litigation. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 11:52 am
Plaintiff agreed to settle her age discrimination case but wanted that agreement revoked after she determined her employer was not being straight with her about the terms of her transfer to a new job location.The case is Smith v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
The decision below is here; the only discussion there is: The petitioner failed to demonstrate “proper cause” for the issuance of a “full carry” permit (Penal Law § 400.00[2][f]; Matter of Hecht v Bivona, 11 AD3d 614; Matter of Sarro v Smith, 8 AD3d 395; Matter of Bando v Sullivan, 290 AD2d 691). [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
Oral arguments in Sullivan v. [read post]
