Search for: "Smith v. Sullivan" Results 1 - 20 of 259
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2024, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The developers lose the case, not because the Village did not demonstrate anti-Jewish animus, but on more mundane procedural grounds.The case is BMG Monroe LLC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Meanwhile, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan said on Monday that Washington expects Israel to not attack areas marked “safe” on the grid-based maps Israel posted urging Palestinians to leave parts of southern Gaza. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:20 am
In the non-precedential decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Smith v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Sullivan, which holds that public figures cannot recover for defamation consistent with the First Amendment unless they demonstrate the press acted recklessly or knowing their statements were false. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
Smith, which holds that laws of general applicability that burden religious exercise are not subject to strict scrutiny. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP has represented the defendants throughout this 13-year litigation. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am by Daphne Keller
  The Supreme Court recognized risks of this kind in a 1959 obscenity prosecution against a bookseller, Smith v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Indian Americans Rapidly Climbing Political Ranks DNyuz – Maggie Astor and Jill Cowan (New York Times) | Published: 2/27/2023 Despite being one of the largest immigrant groups in the U.S., Americans of Indian descent in 20123 were barely represented in politics. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
On 26 October 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]