Search for: "Smith v. The U.S. Department of Justice" Results 1 - 20 of 736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2024, 7:09 am by Howard Bashman
Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Smith v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm by Steven Calabresi
Smith is a mere employee of the Department of Justice, and he lacks the power to initiate prosecutions. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Clarence Thomas refers to Operation Mongoose, involving CIA and other U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am by Fred Wertheimer
Trump has filed multiple motions designed to delay the trial until past the November election, after which, if he wins the election, he is expected to instruct the Justice Department to drop the case. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm by Steven Calabresi
It is critically important to American liberty that we read the organic statutes setting up the Justice Department as only authorizing the appointing of presidentially nominated and Senate-confirmed U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am by Amy Howe
After Chutkan denied that request in December, it was Smith who came to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to weigh in on Trump’s claim to immunity without waiting for the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm by Amy Howe
(William Hennessy) Arguing on behalf of the Department of Justice, U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
One need look no further than last week’s sentencing of Samuel Bankman-Fried to see the impact of noncompliance.[12] In advance of the sentencing, the Department of Justice filed hundreds of victim statements with the court.[13] The victim statements reflect the incredibly broad cross-section of people who were harmed by the fraud that Bankman-Fried was convicted of: single parents, retirees, young people, grandparents. [read post]