Search for: "Smith v. US Department of Ed et al" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Aukerman, et al    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitDAMON J. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
They may enable us to get a keener insight into our society and its problems. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm by Marie Louise
(Article One Partners) Patenting green technology: What you need to know (IPEG) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in case concerning laser inscribing of diamonds a mixed bag: Lazare Kaplan v PhotoScribe (IPBiz) CAFC sides with USPTO in patent re-examination declaration dispute: In re Meyer Manufacturing (Patents Post-Grant) District Court N D Illinois: Scrivener’s error in patent marking does not preclude finding of intent to deceive: Lundeen et al… [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
Solomon introduced a bill that eventually became the Solomon Amendment [8], mandating, in part, that military recruiters not be denied access to campuses lest the entire university be cut off from funding derived from the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, et al. [9],[10]. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Wired had a piece “Universities are using surveillance software to spy on students”. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm by John Elwood
  (The Court CVSG’ed in Cook after the Long Conference.) [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 11 December 2019 Julian Knowles J handed down judgment in the case Kirkegaard v Smith  [2019] EWHC 3393 (QB). [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
In 1982, the Supreme Court again addressed and advanced solicitor-client privilege in Descôteaux et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]