Search for: "Smith v. United States Navy"
Results 1 - 20
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2019, 9:34 am
United States, which asked whether an employee of the Navy who died due to a complication could sue the federal government under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
23 May 2018, 5:58 am
Spilman reports that: CAAF decided the Navy case of United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 7:42 am
Smith, 27 M.J. 242 (C.M.A. 1988); United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:01 am
We expect better from an attorney representing the United States. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
In Ramirez v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm
The great object [of the statute]… was to protect the merchant vessels of the United States and their crews from piratical aggressions. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 11:01 am
United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878)). [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 1:54 pm
" United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:42 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 1:06 am
Smith. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Furthermore, Story would expressly engage in a discussion of the Constitution's "officers of the United States"-language and "office under the United States" three sections later: in Section 791. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:55 pm
Eugene Kontorovich passes along the news about United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
FISHER At all relevant times, Meredith was a member of the United States Navy stationed at Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar (Miramar). [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:17 pm
New Yorker has a piece on United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm
United States (09-1298); Boeing Company v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
The Court first pointed to Department of the Navy v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:57 am
United States, 536 U.S. 1014 (2002). [read post]
